For agencies

Built for agencies that work inside many client accounts.

Marketing, digital, growth and performance agencies, typically 50–500 people, running work across many independent client environments. AAG lets more of your team use AI on client accounts, one client boundary at a time.

Useful workflows

What your team can do, and what your agency can build

Illustrated concept
An AAG console manages configuration and status for six separate client gateways, with sample active and paused states.

One console, separate client boundaries

View full size ↗

Manage client setup, access and status from one console. Each client retains its own credential vault, policy and record. Central administration does not combine their data boundaries.

Conceptual management view with sample statuses. Live requests are enforced by each client gateway; the console is not the request router. See the actual console demo →

Your team, with AAG

Client-scoped answers for every account team

A strategist asks AI about one client, and the answer comes from that client’s own accounts — never another client’s. No login changes hands.

Your agency could build

Client intelligence services on scoped access

Regular performance briefings for each client, prepared with AI and reviewed by your specialists. Your agency designs, prices and delivers the service. AAG supplies the client-scoped access underneath it.

A possibility for your agency, not a feature AAG delivers.

Team capacity

More people working on more accounts

Client questions stop waiting on the one person who can reach every account. Specialists keep the judgment; access stays inside each client’s boundary.

Illustrated concept
An approved client brief passes an AAG access check before reaching an authorized strategist, analyst and account lead.

One brief, a shared understanding

View full size ↗

A common brief gives authorized teammates the same goals, brand voice, definitions and agreed direction. Access still depends on the person’s permissions and client scope.

Illustrative team workflow. The roles are examples, not a fixed permission model or a claim of deployed brief-management features. Discuss your team workflow →

Let more of the team work on more accounts

Account questions stop depending on the one person who holds every login. People work within the client access they are given, and specialists still review what matters.

Answer the client security questionnaire with evidence

When a client asks how their data is separated from other clients’ data, the answer is a boundary you can describe and an audit record you can produce.

Offboard a client cleanly

Revoke a client’s credentials or destroy its gateway, to stop subsequent access after propagation, while preserving the record of what happened.

Stop sharing logins over chat

One-time credential intake replaces credentials pasted into messages, stored in browsers, or kept in a spreadsheet that outlives the person who made it.

Change AI vendors without re-securing everything

The client boundary is defined in AAG, not in a model vendor’s console, so adding or changing an AI client does not restart your access work.

A service your agency could build

Connect the question to the client outcome.

Illustrated concept
Advertising, website analytics and CRM data for the same reporting period contribute to a unified client analysis.

See the whole client picture

View full size ↗

The example connects campaign activity, website conversions and CRM outcomes for an aligned reporting period. It illustrates a service your agency could design on authorized access.

All metrics and conclusions are synthetic. Multiple-source analysis is an agency workflow concept, not a delivered AAG reporting feature or proof that these connectors are available. Review connector status →

Onboarding and offboarding

The same steps for client 10 and client 100

Illustrated concept
Offboarding closes gateway access, tracks provider credential revocation and retains audit evidence according to policy.

Close access, keep the record

View full size ↗

Closing AAG access and revoking credentials at the provider are separate steps. Track each provider’s result, then retain the access record according to the agreed retention policy.

Illustrative checklist. Verified and pending are possible provider outcomes, not simultaneous proof of completion. Revocation must be confirmed for each connection. Explore gateway lifecycle →

  1. New client

    Create the client’s gateway. The client authorizes access, and a credential owner submits the credential once through protected intake.

  2. Team changes

    Access follows the client boundary, not whoever holds a login. Suspend a gateway or revoke a credential when something changes.

  3. Client leaves

    Revoke the credential or destroy the gateway. Subsequent access is refused after propagation, and the record of past access stays available.

Security-review evidence

When a client asks how you keep their data separate

Answer with a boundary you can describe and a record you can produce.

  • How are Client A’s and Client B’s credentials segregated from each other?
  • Can the AI receive only capabilities, and never raw credentials?
  • Can one client be suspended or offboarded without affecting the others?
  • Can you prove which AI accessed which client system, under which authority?

How the boundary is built →

Bring us one real client workflow

The first step is a short conversation about fit and scope.